NEW RELEASE:

Canada’s Adult Vaccine

Funding Gap

NACI recommends vaccines based on evidence, but public funding across Canada is not consistent.
Where you live continues to shape access to recommended adult vaccines.

About This Analysis:

Vaccines are one of the most effective and cost-saving tools in healthcare. But in Canada, access to publicly funded adult vaccines often depends on geography—not just clinical need.

The Adult Vaccine Alliance (AVA) reviews vaccine funding across provinces and territories each year to identify gaps between:

  • National clinical recommendations (NACI)

  • Public funding programs

This analysis shows where funding aligns—and where it falls short—helping inform advocacy for more equitable access.

The Benchmark:
NACI Recommendations

Note: NACI recommendations provide clinical guidance. Public funding eligibility may vary by province/territory and may also differ by vaccine product, risk group, or delivery setting.

What Is Recommended?

The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides evidence-based recommendations for vaccine use across the life course. These recommendations reflect clinical need—not funding decisions.
AVA’s analysis focuses on six adult vaccines with significant impact on prevention, equity, and health-system resilience.

Why these 6 vaccines?

Click each vaccine to view NACI recommendations
and why it matters.

Example: Current funding gap for Covid-19 vaccine access

Why Funding Differs Across Canada

Provinces and territories are responsible for their own immunization programs, including:

  • Which vaccines are funded

  • Who is eligible

  • How vaccines are delivered

  • When programs are implemented

As a result, a vaccine may be strongly recommended by NACI, yet still be:

  • Not funded

  • Partially funded

  • Limited to specific populations

  • Inconsistently accessible across care settings

This creates real-world access barriers—particularly for individuals without primary care or those relying on pharmacy-based services.

WHY THIS MATTERS?

A postal-code lottery in prevention
Access to recommended vaccines should be based on health risk—not geography.

Out-of-pocket costs limit uptake
Costs disproportionately impact low-income adults, seniors, and those without insurance.

Inconsistent funding creates confusion
Variation across programs makes it harder for patients and providers to understand eligibility and access.

Avoidable strain on the health system
Lower uptake leads to preventable illness, hospitalizations, and increased system burden.

THE GAP IN ACTION

This snapshot shows how public funding aligns with NACI recommendations across provinces and territories.

Toggle vaccines to see the status of funding across Canada.

Explore the vaccines & their funding status

COVID-19
RSV
Pneumococcal
Influenza
HPV
SHINGLES

System Barriers
to Access Exists

788 days

Median time from approval to public funding in Canada

Zero Provinces

Fully aligned with national recommendations

Even after regulatory approval and national guidance, vaccines often face significant delays before being publicly funded. These delays limit access, increase out-of-pocket costs, and reduce the impact of prevention.

Structural barriers contribute to uneven adoption across Canada —reinforcing inequities in access.

Moving Toward More Consistent Access

Canada’s adult immunization system should not depend on one’s postal code.

Improving alignment between national recommendations and provincial implementation can:

  • Reduce inequities in access

  • Improve uptake

  • Prevent avoidable illness

  • Strengthen health system sustainability

AVA is working with partners across the country to support:

  • More consistent public funding

  • Timely adoption of NACI recommendations

  • Accessible delivery models, including pharmacy-based care

  • Stronger coordination and accountability across jurisdictions